Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060911181758.GE28613@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > well I think Andrew is more scared of having multiple boxes on the > buildfarm all stating to be "Debian testing" or "Debian unstable" but > without much information on how regulary those boxes are actually synced > to those moving/changing branches and causing discussions on "why is it > suddenly failung on that box but not on the other". It might make sense to attach the version information (in this case, gcc, glibc, kernel versions) to each particular test run, rather than to each particular farm member. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: