Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200609072252.k87MqAu09347@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > If you are using an external tool, can't you just restrict what you > > display based on the logged duration? > > I think his basic complaint is that doing the full logging pushup for > even short-duration queries is too expensive, and that logging only the > duration and not the query text or parameters makes a significant speed > difference. I'm not at all sure that I buy that, but if it's true then > subsequent filtering obviously doesn't help. Well, except for bind, all the log output display is zero cost, just a printf(), as I remember. The only cost that is significant, I think, is the timing of the query, and that is happening for all the setttings discussed. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: