Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200609011207.38628.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Getting a move on for 8.2 beta (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > September is upon us and it doesn't seem like we are ready to ship > a beta. I think it's time to start making some hard choices. > > In the main code I see these outstanding features/patches: > > * bitmap indexes > * updatable views > * GUC variable reload + refactoring (previously applied and reverted) > * plpython improvements (needs review by someone who knows plpython) > * plpgsql improvements for returning record types > * patch to build on VC What's VC? > * make libpq default client_encoding setting from locale? > > In contrib we've got: > > * new ISBN/etc module > * hstore (finally proposed for inclusion) > * new sslinfo module > * pgstattuple changes > * removing the deadwood This is just a delete. I've fixed the pgFoundry permissions issues and will be loading the last CVS snapshot today. At that point, Bruce can delete stuff. Can you be a little clearer on which things are non-working patches, and which things are pending due to lack of review? I'm all for bouncing stuff that's not ready to go, but bouncing stuff because we haven't recruited enough code reviewers is just bad practice. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: