Re: Autovacuum on by default?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608292123.53906.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum on by default? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter, > OK, it seems that while everyone wants autovacuum be more aggressive by > default, no one has any good data to support one setting or another. I > so I suggest that we just cut scale factor and base threshold in half > right now (so it'd be 0.2, 0.1, 500, 250) and see about a > better-researched setting for the next release. I'd recommend actually 0.4 and 0.2 and 200 and 100. I think that 20% and 10% are too aggresive. 0.4 and 0.2 are what I've been using in production on many machines. On the other hand, I think that the thresholds are much too high -- that means that many small tables may never get vacuumed at all, even after 100% row replacement. I'll admit, however, that I don't have test data to support this. Unfortunately we never got to good Autovac tests on the STP before it went down. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: