Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera írta:
> But COPY view (col1, col2, ...) TO may still be
> useful even if the COPY (SELECT ...) (col1, col2, ...) TO
> is pointless. [1]
Hum, I don't understand what you're saying here -- are you saying that
you can't do something with the first form, that you cannot do with the
second?
> >It's ugly because you are forcing the system to parse something that
> >was already parsed.
>
> Well, to be true to the word, during parsing COPY view TO
> the parser never saw SELECT * FROM view.
Hmm!
The COPY view stuff stopped working when I changed back the "relation"
case. Your patch changed it so that instead of flowing as RangeVar all
the way to the copy.c code, the parser changed it into a "select * from
%s" query, and then stashed the resulting Query node into the "query"
%case. (So what was happening was that the Relation case was never
%used). I reverted this.
> >On the other hand I don't see why you are arguing in favor of a useless
> >feature whose coding is dubious; you can have _the same thing_ with nice
> >code and no discussion.
>
> Because of [1] and because Mr. Schoenig's arguments
> about changing schemas.
Yeah, that argument makes sense to me as well.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support