Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060825183711.GL16535@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:13:39PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API > > seems like useless clutter. > > Where else to put it? We need it in libpq anyway if we want this > behavior in all client applications (by default). Is that so? I thought we were only talkng about psql. Even then, I'm wondering if we should alter the current behaviour at all if stdout is not a tty (i.e. run as a pipe). And as a counter-example: pg_dump should absolutly not use the client locale, it should always dump as the same encoding as the server... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: