Re: logos and the BSD license
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logos and the BSD license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608231923.43117.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logos and the BSD license ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: logos and the BSD license
Re: logos and the BSD license |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Am Mittwoch, 23. August 2006 18:29 schrieb Joshua D. Drake: > Well, in the spirit of the BSD I would say: > > Attribution (by) > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Well, the main problem with that license is that it prohibits you from copying the works over encrypted links or storing the works on encrypted media or a computer protected by a password. "You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures that control access" The more general problem is that it is excessively complicated and ambiguously worded and doesn't achieve anything beyond what the BSD license does. If the BSD license is too complicated still, I can offer the following alternative license: "You may use, modify and redistribute this software as you wish." -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: