Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608222315.59454.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES]
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me > > either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to > > revert to the old way? > > Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering > both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much appear to be one > and the same to me anyway. I'm curious, do you combine any other lists like that? I've played around with that idea (for example, I used to combine webmaster emails, pgsql-www, and -slaves emails but the slaves traffic was too high so I had to split it back out). As someone subscribed to a good dozen pg lists, I've always been quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to process... I suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but I suspect there are some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone combine all pg mail to one folder?) -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: