Re: Windows 2000 Support

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000
> > SP4 or above".
> >
> > FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make
> > SP5 for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before...
> 
> Unless there actually is a version of that operating system that is not 
> labelled "Windows 2000 SP4" that is supported, this expression is 
> meaningless.
> 
> Note that the list of "supported" platforms in the documentation does 
> not make any open interval claims (or any interval claims for that 
> matter).
> 
> If you know that anything before Windows 2000 SP4 is unsupported, that 
> would be useful information, but not the other way around.

I see who mentions of Win2000, one in the FAQ, another in the release
notes.  If people want the text changed, I want an example showing exactly
what the new wording should be because you can't just add "and later"
into the text we have now.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +