Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608190452.k7J4qhY08256@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:16:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > A \set variable would make sense to me. > > > > So Peter and Bruce like a \set variable, Chris and I like a > > different command. Seems like a tie ... more votes out there > > anywhere? > > It seems to me that a \set variable lets people use minimal > intrusiveness on scripts, etc., as they'll just set it when they start > needing cursor-ized result sets and unset it when finished. True. They could even put it in .psqlrc if they want. Basically need a way to modify \g. Seems a \set is the way we have always done such modifications in the past. The big question is whether this is somehow different. Personally, I don't think so. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: