Re: Connection string

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:56:03PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 05:59:23AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > I'll submit a patch.  However, in the case of string literals not
> > working, is that a documentation bug or a code bug?  Are they
> > supposed to work?
>
> You shoudl be able to use a string constant or a char * variable as
> database name. There are a lot of test cases for connect available under
> ecpg/test/connect now. If string literals do not work we have fix it and
> add it to the test suite.

Will that be a minor fix that can be backpatched or will it be
invasive enough to be fixed only in HEAD?  I'll submit a documentation
patch (or patches for different versions) but I'll need to know how
much to change.

--
Michael Fuhr