Re: [BUGS] numerics lose scale and precision in views of unions

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:35:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Yeah, because numeric_cmp says that 1.0 and 1.00 are equal (what else
> >> could it say?  "less" and "greater" are surely wrong).  So you need to
> > It could say "not equal" pretty reasonably as the scale is
> > different.
> Nope, there are exactly three options: equal, less, greater.
> btree doesn't understand anything else.

Mathematically, 1.0 = 0.9500... -> 1.05000...

In theory, B-Tree could be fine with this. As long as the operators
for =, <>, <, and > are made to consistently understand this principle.
For example:
   1.0 = 0.95   1.0 = 1.05   1.0 <> 0.94   1.0 <> 1.06   0.94 < 1.0   1.06 > 1.0

I'm not sure that it warrants being changed, though. Storing mixed
precision values in a column and expecting the database to understand
rounding rules does not appeal to me. Too magical.

Cheers,
mark

-- 
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com     __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   | 
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
 One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all                      and in the darkness
bindthem...
 
                          http://mark.mielke.cc/