Re: 8.2 features status
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.2 features status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608091614.k79GELJ23796@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2 features status (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.2 features status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > I am keeping URLs in the TODO list. Why don't people submit > > improvements to the TODO list, rather than adding more complexity by > > making a separate wiki for every TODO item? If no one updates the TODO > > item, what makes you think they are going to do somethin in a wiki? > > > > You can update a wiki instantly. Unless you are a committer, updating > the TODO list involves sending in a patch. > > It should be added that the idea that the TODO list has much authority > has been decried in the past. True, it is my attempt at a TODO, and people do ask for adjustments. > > I think the big conclusion we made long ago is that We are never going > > to have enough detail anywhere that someone is going to be able to work > > on an item without asking the community. > > > > Wikis take a tiny bit of getting used to. But they are extremely useful > - they can be used like a kind of online notebook. I find it much easier > to make progress notes, reminders, etc in a wiki than in a notebook that > I forget to take with me half the time. And they are thus also a great > place to record progress. > > Until you have used this, it seems strange. After you start it doesn't ;-) Sure, but with openness comes cruft, which can be a problem too. Do we want everyone's idea of a useful feature listed? I don't. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: