Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On-disk bitmap index patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200607291331.k6TDVV415624@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On-disk bitmap index patch ("Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Luke Lonergan wrote: > Mark, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mark@mark.mielke.cc [mailto:mark@mark.mielke.cc] > > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:26 PM > > > > But irrefutable? Irrefutable is not true. :-) > > How about unrefuted. The evidence has not been refuted, and not > directly discussed or discounted. > > BTREE can not be optimized to produce the results we've presented, the > discussion about char(n) datatypes was irrelevant as we had shown > results for INT, numeric and char/varchar and they were all dramatically > better than BTREE. > > I am hopeful this discussion takes a rapid turn toward the quantitative > assessment of the results. Right. People need a patch to test on their workloads, and analysis can be done after feature freeze. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: