Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:36:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm sure some people agree that there is a problem.  It would help, 
> however, if you were not talking about two different things at once. 
> And it would help if you actually proposed a change that would improve 
> matters.

What two things are there? I think I've already proposed a solution: do
the schema usage check at the same time as all the other permission
checks. Alternately, document the behavior accurately. I've proposed
text here too, but the revisions keep missing the point. What needs
clarification?