Re: Time to scale up?
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to scale up? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060726122645.SARV16051.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp1.sympatico.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Time to scale up? (Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
What about using the live CD as one way to answer this problem? Just create a live CD that installs everything under thesun (pun intended) On July 26, 2006 02:16 am, Josh Berkus wrote: > Paul, > > > I have been amazed by the power of the simple optimization rule "remove > > barriers to entry", and how it has worked. The Windows port of PgSQL > > and associated installer (itself a "distribution" in the kernel-metaphor > > sense, only carried on the main PostgreSQL site) has had a huge affect > > on PostGIS usage, so I assume the same holds true for PgSQL in general. > > > > But such an approach (one size fits all, click the big green button for > > download) is basically the diametric opposite of what you suggest. > > Well, for example we *can't* do a one-size-fits all including PostGIS > unless you get it re-licensed. > > However, I've been talking about build systems here at the conference > again. While it's a technical barrier there may be open source software > we can borrow. The best of all possible worlds would be to have: > > pg_install > > > install base > > .... done > > > install gis > > Package GIS is GPL licensed. Package GIS requires x, y, z. Proceed? > > if that's not possible, then having more clear packages would be the > next best thing. Given a shortage of labor, though, I think that it > might be better to just provide documentation to the OS build engineers > and vendors about add-ins they might be interested in and how to find > and build them. >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: