Re: 64-bit integers for GUC
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit integers for GUC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200607251438.17233.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 64-bit integers for GUC (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit integers for GUC
Re: 64-bit integers for GUC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 14:15 schrieb Tom Lane: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > ISTM that before long someone will want to use more than 2 GB for > > work_mem. Currently, you can't set more because it overflows the > > variable. > > Yes you can, because the value is measured in KB. Right, so there is probably a bug in my patch ... Nevermind then. All the other options are OK with 32 bit ints. > I'd be fairly worried about whether that wouldn't mean we fail > completely on INT64_IS_BROKEN platforms ... I wonder whether platforms with INT64_IS_BROKEN can address more than 2GB of memory anyway. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: