Re: root/administartor user check option.
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: root/administartor user check option. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060725122628.GA18074@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: root/administartor user check option. (Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gevik Babakhani wrote: > > Removing or disabling the test without removing some of the dangerous > > capabilities would be a major security hole. For example: postgres can > > deliver to any authenticated user the contents of any text file on the > > system that the database user can read. Do you want the responsibility > > of allowing that for any file the administrator can read? No, I thought > > not. Neither do we. > > True. This means that one just cannot "copy over" PG files and run the > database without creating additional users and services. > > Just looking at how much windows standalone apps are being developed > which potentially could use an "embedded" or "light" version of PG, I > still think the option should be considered. Perhaps in a more > restricted or striped-down version of PG. (PG Light or something). Postgres is BSD, so feel free to create and "Insecure Postgres" and distribute however you like. Note that pg_ctl contains code to be started as admin and drop the privileges early. That may be able to satisfy your requirements without being extremely insecure. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: