Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200607241738.32609.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Better name/syntax for "online" index creation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 17:13 schrieb Tom Lane: > To my mind, "ONLINE" just doesn't convey any useful information --- > the existing CREATE INDEX functionality could already be said to be > "online", in the sense that you don't have to take down the database > to do it. I thought about "SHARED" but someone could probably raise > the same objection to it. Anyone have a better idea? CONCURRENTLY > I'm tempted to put the new keyword at the very front: > > SHARED CREATE INDEX .... > > which would probably mean that we'd have to document it as if it were a > completely separate command from CREATE INDEX, but then again that might > not be a bad thing considering how differently the two cases behave. What is so different about them that would justify this? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: