Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060719035236.GI4963@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > 'k, so is the concensus here that I regenerate everything with the 'broken > msg seperator', and then revert to the unbroken one for new stuff? its no > sweat, I just fear this is going to re-crop up sometime in the future if > we ever have to regenerate from the mbox files, as well have some in > 'broken format' and some in the 'unbroken', but renumbering *then* will > still affect everything ... One idea is to keep the old archives using the broken separator, and regenerate the good archives in some other directory, or with a different prefix (say, instead of msg0234.php have it be named mesg0234.php or msg0234.1.php, etc). That way the old URLs would continue to work, and there wouldn't be a problem if the archives need to be regenerated in the future. OTOH it would be good to have a collection of messages by Message-Id which could be used as a permalink. For example http://archives.postgresql.org/by-id/20060718220947.M957@ganymede.hub.org or something like that. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: