Re: permission to create user
От | Michael Fuhr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: permission to create user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060718133103.GA41200@winnie.fuhr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: permission to create user (Rafal Pietrak <rafal@zorro.isa-geek.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: permission to create user
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 01:45:01PM +0200, Rafal Pietrak wrote: > Any one knows, why do I have to explicitly SET ROLE, when I try to > exercise the group priviledge of role creation, while I don't need that > when accessing tables? Is this a feature, or a bug? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/role-membership.html "The role attributes LOGIN, SUPERUSER, CREATEDB, and CREATEROLE can be thought of as special privileges, but they are never inherited as ordinary privileges on database objects are. You must actually SET ROLE to a specific role having one of these attributes in order to make use of the attribute. Continuing the above example, we might well choose to grant CREATEDB and CREATEROLE to the admin role. Then a session connecting as role joe would not have these privileges immediately, only after doing SET ROLE admin." -- Michael Fuhr
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: