Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Don't be surprised if there are objections - this is one of those things 
> >> like emacs vs vi that stirs up religious debate.
> >>     
> >
> > If we change Reply-To:, does it prevent replies to the original author? 
> > If so, that seems like a problem, particularly if they are not
> > subscribed to the patches list.
> >
> >   
> 
> Depends on the MUA. See both sides of the debate here: 
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html . We use reply-to for 
> the pgfoundry admins list, but that's a closed list. For open lists that 
> often accept non-member posts it is much more of a problem, not least 
> for the reason you suggest.

Let's add the author and the hackers list to the reply-to.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +