Re: More nuclear options
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More nuclear options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200607111324.17916.jd@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More nuclear options (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything > associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a > little hollow. I would say that: > Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything > associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a > little hollow. Strengthens JoshB's argument, not lessens it. That is also an argument for Gforge admins, not hackers :) > > > In a year nobody has spoken up for those specific projects. Who's > > going to maintain them? Who's going to use them? > > People do get pointed at adddepends even today... certainly no one will do > anything with these projects if you nuke them, but I like giving people > options... your call though. They will always be able to pull down the source from a previous release. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: