Re: Is OpenFTS dead?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is OpenFTS dead? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200607092043.11266.jd@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is OpenFTS dead? (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is OpenFTS dead?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 08 July 2006 22:34, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:57 , howachen@gmail.com wrote: > > FTS will get more and more important for a DBMS system, i think pgsql > > should also consider improving this, isn't? > > I believe a very common FTS solution used with PostgreSQL is > tsearch2, which is included in contrib/. Have you looked at tsearch2? > Does it meet your needs? OpenFTS sits on top of Tsearch2. All it is is some high level apis (perl/python) to create a search engine using PostgreSQL and Tsearch2. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Michael Glaesemann > grzm seespotcode net > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: