Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060706163806.GB20946@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys (mark@mark.mielke.cc) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:12:18PM -0400, mark@mark.mielke.cc wrote: > Please answer the below questions, and state whether your opinion is > just an opinion, or whether you are stating it as a PostgreSQL > maintainer and it is law. If you wish, you can rank preferences. Do I have to pick only one? I'd choose firstly for: 1c) UUID, with only encode/decode/indexable - generic except for the name of the type, and the encoding format. 2a) In core first And in addation to that: 1b) UUID, with only basic generation functions + encode/decode/indexable 2b) In contrib first. And maybe finally: 1a) UUID, with all functions 2c) In pgfoundry first. IOW, I'm not so convinced that full UUID support should appear in core, but I think a 16-byte type should be available in core, with basic UUID functions in contrib and the full suite on pgfoundry. But that's just my opinion ofcourse. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: