Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint
От | Richard Broersma Jr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060701014108.79890.qmail@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint
Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint |
Список | pgsql-sql |
> > CHECK ( 1 = ALL ( SELECT COUNT(STATUS) > > FROM BADGES > > WHERE STATUS = 'A' > > GROUP BY EMPNO)) > > From the PostgreSQL docs (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/ > interactive/sql-createtable.html) > > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX one_a_badge_per_employee_idx > ON badges (empno) > WHERE status = 'A'; > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-createindex.html > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/indexes-partial.html Michael, Partial indexs seem to be "what the doctor ordered!" And your suggest is right on, the idea of the constraint is to allow only one active badge status at a time. But now that I think about it, using the authors suggestion (if it actually worked), how would would it be possible to change the active status from one badge to another? Oh well, partial index are obvious the superior solution since the entire table doesn't not have to be scanned to determine if the new badge can be set to active. Once again thanks for the insight. Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: