Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060623033744.GI16383@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 6/22/06, Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> wrote: > >When an update occurs, the existing row version is > >copied to te UNDO file > > Not in all systems. A few now perform in-memory UNDO and only write > it to disk if and when it is required. How does that work? If the last transaction is not finished after it wrote the tuple when the power goes out, and the UNDO is not written to disk either, how do you reconstruct the tuple at all? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: