Re: MultiXacts & WAL
От | paolo romano |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MultiXacts & WAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060617064725.22507.qmail@web27811.mail.ukl.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MultiXacts & WAL (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: MultiXacts & WAL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br />>May be this is needed to support savepoints/subtransactions? Or is it <br />> something else that i am missing?<br/><br />It's for two-phase commit. A prepared transaction can hold locks that need <br />to be recovered.<br /><br/></blockquote><br />When a transaction enters (successfully) the prepared state it only retains its exclusive locksand releases any shared locks (i.e. multixacts)... or, at least, that's how it should be in principle according to serializiatontheory, i haven't yet checked out if this is what is done in postgresql .<br /><p> Chiacchiera con i tuoi amiciin tempo reale! <br /> http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: