Re: [Win32] Problem with rename()
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200606162005.k5GK5LI28654@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Win32] Problem with rename()
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I am assuming this problem and the other rash of Win32 problems reported in March are now all fixed in 8.1.4. If not, please let me know. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > "Peter Brant" <Peter.Brant@wicourts.gov> writes: > >> Does that also explain why an attempt to make a new connection just > >> hangs? > > > Actually, I was just wondering about that --- seems like a bare > > connection attempt should not generate any WAL entries. Do you have any > > nondefault actions in ~/.psqlrc or something like that? > > I just repeated the hangup scenario here, and confirmed that I can still > start and stop a plain-vanilla psql session (no ~/.psqlrc, no special > per-user or per-database settings) without it hanging. I can also do > simple read-only SELECTs. So I'm thinking your hang must involve some > additional non-read-only actions. > > [ thinks for awhile longer ... ] No, I take that back. Once you'd > exhausted the current pg_clog page (32K transactions), even read-only > transactions would be blocked by the need to create a new pg_clog page > (which is a WAL-logged action). A read-only transaction never actually > makes a WAL entry, but it does still consume an XID and hence a slot on > the current pg_clog page. So I just hadn't tried enough transactions. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: