Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl]
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200606162000.k5GK0wO27800@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] (Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Volkan YAZICI wrote: > To mention about the followed implementation, it needed some hack on > pqParseInput3() code to make it understand if a received message is > a reponse to a Describe ('D') query or to another tuple returning > query. To summarize problem, there're two possible forms of a 'D' > response: > > 1. Description of a prepared statement: t, T, Z > 2. Description of a portal: T, Z > > The problem is, AFAICS, it's not possible to distinguish between a tuple > returning query (T, ..., C, Z or T, E) and a description of a portal (T, > Z). Therefore, I've created a global flag (parsing_row_desc) which is > turned on when we receive a 'T' and turned off if we receive a 'C' or > 'E'. It's a kind of ugly method but the only solution I could come up > with. The problem with this solution is that it is not thread-safe. Perhaps you can use a per-PGconn boolean? -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: