Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200606142212.k5EMCm204045@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Would someone please find the answer to Tom's last question? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Looking at this, I wonder if there isn't a bug or at least an > > inefficiency in 8.1. The KeysEqual short circuit tests are still there > > in ri_triggers.c; aren't they now redundant with the test in triggers.c? > > And don't they need to account for the special case mentioned in the > > comment in triggers.c, that the RI check must still be done if we are > > looking at a row updated by the same transaction that created it? > > OK, I take back the possible-bug comment: the special case only applies > to the FK-side triggers, which is to say RI_FKey_check, and that routine > doesn't attempt to skip the check on equal old/new keys. I'm still > wondering though if the KeysEqual tests in the other RI triggers aren't > now a waste of cycles. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: