Re: COPY view
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200606142119.k5ELJiV23663@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | COPY view (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY view
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>I don't see why views should be special. Tables clearly should be > >>because we can open them directly. > >> > >> > > > >Ah, I didn't think of that. Good idea. So we don't need this patch? > > > > > > > > why do we agree on a patch, implement it and reject it then? > would be easier to reject it before actually implementing it ... > it is quite hard to explain to a customer that something is rejected > after approval - even if things are written properly ... Agreed. The problem with this patch is that originally we just wanted views, and later the idea of putting a query in there was agreed on, so the feature request has changed over time. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: