Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060526163540.GJ23789@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error ("Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Gurjeet Singh wrote: > *************** BeginTransactionBlock(void) > *** 2725,2731 **** > case TBLOCK_SUBINPROGRESS: > case TBLOCK_ABORT: > case TBLOCK_SUBABORT: > ! ereport(WARNING, > (errcode(ERRCODE_ACTIVE_SQL_TRANSACTION), > errmsg("there is already a > transaction in progress"))); > break; > --- 2726,2732 ---- > case TBLOCK_SUBINPROGRESS: > case TBLOCK_ABORT: > case TBLOCK_SUBABORT: > ! ereport(ERROR, > (errcode(ERRCODE_ACTIVE_SQL_TRANSACTION), > errmsg("there is already a > transaction in progress"))); > break; This should depend on the GUC variable for the patch to work at all ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: