Re: allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE
От | Shelby Cain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060524002914.43475.qmail@web37205.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message ---- >From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com> >To: Shelby Cain <alyandon@yahoo.com> >Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>; SCassidy@overlandstorage.com; Postgres >general mailing list <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org >Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:19:58 PM >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE > >The issue is that vacuum has to base it's decisions not on the oldest >running transaction that has locks on a table, but on the oldest running >transaction in the entire database, because that transaction could start >reading any table at any time. Until that changes, long-running >transactions of any kind and heavy-update tables simply won't mix well >at all in a single database. Now I understand... thanks for the clarification. Regards, Shelby Cain
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: