Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060522191418.GA13518@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] } > > > ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT > > > EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments ) > > > > And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were > > modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that > > you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables. > > Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a > tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole > set to the trigger. OTOH it would be nice to be able to save only the TIDs of the tuples, not the tuples themselves ... maybe create a "TIDstore"? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: