Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060518162421.GK64371@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:35:34PM -0400, John DeSoi wrote: > > On May 17, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: > > >What is the best way to go about creating a "plug and play," > >PostgreSQL > >replacement for MySQL? I think the biggest problem getting PostgreSQL > >accepted is that so much code is available for MySQL. > > > http://pgfoundry.org/projects/mysqlcompat/ Even better would be coming up with a compatability mode, a la what EnterpriseDB has done for Oracle. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: