Re: Constraint question
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Constraint question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060515151249.GE26212@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Constraint question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Constraint question
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:50:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Enzo Daddario <enzo@pienetworks.com> writes: > > I am now required the remove thousands of obsolete records from table > > "X" and even though I have removed all related rows in all related > > tables, the deletion of rows in table "X" is taking WAY TOO LONG. > > You need to put indexes on the referencing columns. Then start a fresh > session for doing the actual deletes (FK check plans are usually cached > per-session). Would SET CONSTRAINTS ... DEFERRED not help, or does it still use the same machinery to do the checking, regardless of how much data there is to check? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: