Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200605110208.k4B28DS04908@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> Well we did have a bug report by Peter Brant, and a test by him with the > >> patch that fixes it, so it seems it should be applied. The URLs I > >> posted had that information. > > > Correction. It only goes into 8.0.X and 8.1.X. CVS HEAD has a > > rewritten file. > > That seems a bit scary --- patching stable branches with a patch that > will get zero testing in HEAD? I think some more testing besides > Peter's would be smart first. What if the patch behaves differently > on different versions of Windows, for instance? We can wait for someone else to report the problem. I think it only happened on Win2003 SP1. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: