Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060510202445.GB26403@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > We tried reproducing this on a backup server. We haven't been able to > wedge the system into a state where there's tons of sblock processes > and nothing's getting done, but we were able to get some processes into > sblock and get stack traces: > > #0 0x000000080135bd2c in recvfrom () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #1 0x00000000004f9898 in secure_read () > #2 0x00000000004fed7b in TouchSocketFile () > #3 0x00000000004fee27 in pq_getbyte () > #4 0x000000000055febf in PostgresMain () > #5 0x000000000053a487 in ClosePostmasterPorts () > #6 0x000000000053bab7 in PostmasterMain () > #7 0x0000000000500436 in main () This stack trace doesn't make any sense. ClosePostmasterPorts is not calling PostgresMain. And pq_getbyte is not calling TouchSocketFile, which in turn isn't calling secure_read. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: