Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060510081016.GA14476@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Mario Weilguni wrote: > > > Could we make BEGIN fail when we already are in a transaction? > > > > We could, but it'd probably break about as many apps as it fixed. > > I wonder whether php shouldn't be complaining about this, instead > > --- doesn't php have its own ideas about controlling where the > > transaction commit points are? > > In fact it would break many application, so it should be at least controllable > by a setting or GUC. You want to make a GUC that makes: BEGIN; BEGIN; Leave you with an aborted transaction? That seems like a singularly useless feature... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: