Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060508194654.GI3351@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3
Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3 |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Ah, there's another reason, and it's that I'm rewriting the tuple in > > place, not calling heap_update. > > Is that really a good idea, as compared to using heap_update? Not sure -- we would leave dead tuples after the VACUUM is finished if we used heap_update, no? ISTM it's undesirable. > (Now, if you're combining this with the very grotty relpages/reltuples > update code, then I'm all for making that xlog properly --- we've gotten > away without it so far but it really should xlog the change.) I hadn't done that, but I'll see what I can do. Notice however that I'm doing this in both pg_class _and_ pg_database. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: