Re: Slow restoration question
| От | Michael Stone |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Slow restoration question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060503121847.GN31328@mathom.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Slow restoration question (Brendan Duddridge <brendan@clickspace.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Slow restoration question
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:09:52PM -0600, Brendan Duddridge wrote: > -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec % CPU /sec %CPU > 0 40365 99.4 211625 61.4 212425 57.0 50740 99.9 730515 100.0 45897.9 190.1 [snip] >Do these numbers seem decent enough for a Postgres database? These numbers seem completely bogus, probably because bonnie is using a file size smaller than memory and is reporting caching effects. (730MB/s isn't possible for a single external RAID unit with a pair of 2Gb/s interfaces.) bonnie in general isn't particularly useful on modern large-ram systems, in my experience. Mike Stone
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: