Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060501214051.GI97354@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:25:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > mark@mark.mielke.cc writes: > > Ah. I was wondering about that. When I saw the first poster tag > > 'SECURITY DEFINER' on the end of the expression I assumed it was > > something that I didn't know you could do... :-) > > No, he was inventing syntax that doesn't exist. Which begs the question, how hard would it be to add that syntax? I suspect it would be useful in cases besides sequences, and certainly seems to be a lot less of a hassle than having to wrap stuff in an extra function just to get that capability... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: