Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission"
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200604261813.k3QIDvo26076@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > we need > > to redesign the permission system to allow for more permission bits > > because otherwise we'll run out soon. > > Only if we keep inventing separate privileges for things as specific > as TRUNCATE. I was just about to raise this point as a possible reason > why not to invent a separate TRUNCATE bit. (There are other problems, > eg both 't' and 'T' letters are already taken.) > > The question that really ought to be answered before doing any of this > is why DELETE privilege shouldn't be sufficient to allow TRUNCATE. TODO has: * %Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Currently only the owner can TRUNCATE a table because triggers are not called, andthe table is locked in exclusive mode. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: