Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
От | mark@mark.mielke.cc |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060425183817.GA9241@mark.mielke.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:33:38PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: > Sad, cause the AMD is, on a price / performance scale, twice the > processor for the same money as the Intel. Maybe a year or two ago. Prices are all coming down. Intel more than AMD. AMD still seems better - but not X2, and it depends on the workload. X2 sounds like biggotry against Intel... :-) Cheers, mark -- mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them... http://mark.mielke.cc/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: