Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
От | richard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060417200141.GC12571@sheugh.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? ("Relaxin" <me@yourhouse.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi all, Just in case this has not been covered in this thread, I will point out that for some speed of operation is of no great interest in selection of a database. The processes I run spend 90% of their time in the application and data transfer, and 10% in the database. Of course I endorse the comments that a lot of work and knowledge is needed to get the best out of postgresql in terms of speed, but for me it runs quickly enough using the defaults. If speed becomes an issue I will ask the mailing list, but I suspect that good database design is much more important. Areas that may be of more interest than speed are: support; documentation; table and tuple locking; data backup and restoration; interface to perl; interface to ODBC; compliance with standards; scalability. These are something a novice, by definition, cannot evaluate. I didn't spend a lot of time evaluating postgresql's features against other DB's. I took the advice of someone I could trust. Maybe if I was building a web app, or running mythTV, or storing cooking recipies I might now be running a different db. HTH Richard A Lough
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: