Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200604171428.k3HES5w08619@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman ( at ) candle ( dot ) pha ( dot ) pa ( dot ) us> writes: > > I am thinking we should throw an error on pg_start_backup() and > > pg_stop_backup if full_page_writes is off. > > No, we'll just change the test in xlog.c so that fullPageWrites is > ignored if XLogArchivingActive. > > > Seems archive_command and > > full_page_writes can still be used if we are not in the process of doing > > a file system backup. > > Think harder: we are only safe if the first write to a given page after > it's mis-copied by the archiver is a full page write. The requirement > therefore continues after pg_stop_backup. Unless you want to add > infrastructure to keep track for *every page* in the DB of whether it's > been fully written since the last backup? I am confused. Since we checkpoint during pg_start_backup(), isn't any write to a file while the tar backup is going on going to be a full page write? And once we pg_stop_backup(), do we need full page writes? -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: