Re: Postgresql Certifications.
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql Certifications. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200604171356.19696.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql Certifications. ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql Certifications.
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 17 April 2006 13:44, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Robert Treat wrote: > > On Monday 17 April 2006 12:22, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Robert Treat wrote: > >>> On Monday 17 April 2006 08:36, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > >>>> On 4/17/06, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>> Marc already did. > >>>> > >>>> I admit, registering the trademark is valid for legal reasons. I was > >>>> making a point of absurdity. > >>> > >>> That is is better to allow companies like microsoft or mysql to become > >>> the defacto oraganization for getting "postgresql-anything" rather than > >>> allowing the established postgresql community to have some influence > >>> over things? > >> > >> Hasn't SRA been offering certification for awhile now? > > > > Yes (I happen to be a SRA PostgreSQL Certified Engineer, and encourage > > others to get certified) but (taking Jonah's absurd postulate to the > > other extreme) if micrsoft were to desire it, they could easily start up > > thier own certification for postgresql and probably fairly quickly have > > numbers over SRA. > > > > While i don't believe that will happen, there are some scenarios floating > > around about them doing a msose (microsoft open source engineer) where > > people would certify knowledge of key components of open source software > > running on windows platforms or interacting with windows products (think > > setting up an open source mail system with exchange at the heart of it). > > PostgreSQL comes into this picture generally as a way to combat mysql > > from eating up the low end market that sql server used to own. It could > > lead to some form of embracing and extending of postgresql tied back into > > thier certification; we wouldn't be the first bsd licensed application > > that they have gotten involved with. > > 'k, and this is a bad thing because ... ? > I might be a great thing. OTOH it could turn into a total cluster like the whole Microsfot/Sun Java debacle. Having some measure of control over what is deemed to be "postgresql-whatever" is not inherently bad. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: