Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries

Dave Page wrote:
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: "Tom Lane"<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Sent:
> 14/04/06 16:22:45 To: "Martijn van Oosterhout"<kleptog@svana.org> Cc:
> "Greg Stark"<gsstark@mit.edu>, "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP
> SD"<ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>, "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>,
> "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Hiroshi
> Inoue"<inoue@tpf.co.jp> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Practical impediment to
> supporting multiple SSL libraries
> 
> > A fair question to ask is whether psqlODBC would consider
> > going back to a non-hybrid implementation if these features did exist
> > in libpq.
> 
> It's not something I want to spend any more time on, and Hiroshi made
> it quite clear on -odbc yesterday that he doesn't want libpq to become
> a requirement of psqlODBC (it's dynamically loaded atm, thus is
> optional).

Hiroshi does not speak for the psqlODBC project.  It is a community
project.

-- Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +