Re: FOREIGN KEYS vs PERFORMANCE
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FOREIGN KEYS vs PERFORMANCE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060411233820.GB49405@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FOREIGN KEYS vs PERFORMANCE (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: FOREIGN KEYS vs PERFORMANCE
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:06:17AM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2006, at 4:13 , Rodrigo Sakai wrote: > > > I think this is an old question, but I want to know if it really > >is well worth to not create some foreign keys an deal with the > >referential integrity at application-level????? > > If I had to choose between one or the other, I'd leave all > referential integrity in the database and deal with the errors thrown > when referential integrity is violated in the application. PostgreSQL > is designed to handle these kinds of issues. Anything you code in > your application is more likely to contain bugs or miss corner cases > that would allow referential integrity to be violated. PostgreSQL has > been pounded on for years by a great many users and developers, > making the likelihood of bugs still remaining much smaller. It's also pretty unlikely that you can make RI in the application perform better than in the database. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: